The Media, and the Dems villainized Hydroxychloroquine ONLY because Trump promoted it use…
And now this…how many died or suffered needlessly?
The c19hcq.com website tracks all of the international studies on hydroxychloroquine and its effects on the coronavirus.
There is now a new study and the results are SHOCKING!
— HCQ for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 245 studies
| Covid Analysis (Preprint) (meta analysis – not included in study count) |
| HCQ for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 245 studies |
| • 100% of the 29 early treatment studies report a positive effect (13 statistically significant in isolation).• Random effects meta-analysis with pooled effects using the most serious outcome reported shows 64% improvement for the 29 early treatment studies (RR 0.36 [0.25-0.50]). Results are similar after exclusion based sensitivity analysis: 66% (RR 0.34 [0.26-0.46]), and after restriction to 21 peer-reviewed studies: 65% (RR 0.35 [0.27-0.47]). Restricting to the 6 RCTs shows 46% improvement (RR 0.54 [0.33-0.86]). Restricting to the 13 mortality results shows 72% lower mortality (RR 0.28 [0.18-0.43]).• Late treatment is less successful, with only 71% of the 166 studies reporting a positive effect. Very late stage treatment is not effective and may be harmful, especially when using excessive dosages.• The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 245 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 1 quadrillion (p = 0.0000000000000008).• 87% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.0037.• There is substantial evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 85% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 72% of retrospective studies do. Studies from North America are 3.4 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.0000000066.• Negative meta analyses of HCQ generally choose a subset of trials, focusing on late treatment, especially trials with very late treatment and excessive dosages.• While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 5% of HCQ studies show zero events in the treatment arm.• Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Not doing so increases the risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and increases mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.• All data to reproduce this paper and the sources are in the appendix. See [Ladapo, Prodromos, Risch, Risch (B)] for other meta analyses showing efficacy when HCQ is used early. |
These numbers are astounding!
** Hydroxychloroquine worked on COVID-19 last spring.
** Hydroxychloroquine worked on COVID-19 last fall.
** Hydroxychloroquine worked on COVID-19 last winter.
** Hydroxychloroquine works on COVID-19 today.
Dr. Fauci and the CDC banned HCQ as a treatment for coronavirus.
They lied about its effects.
They lied about its dangers.
When will Dr. Fauci be held accountable for the greatest mass murder in modern US history?
When will the CDC be held accountable?
When will Americans wake up?